ODI 12c First impressions


When I started working with ODI it was in version 10, and back there we had a few bugs, the UI was good (back there we could change the expressions and we didn’t have to take out the focus to save the changes, for example) , everything worked well, we could write a variable name with upper or lower case, the metadata navigator worked very well and that was one of the things that made the users choose ODI instead of power center Informatica, because they had an easy way to run their interface at will, and some other good things. It was a very stable version of ODI, good times.

Then 11 version came out. Well, the first thing we noticed was the UI, and the huge amount of bugs that came with it, and most of them in the interface screen. In 11 version, if you try to delete a filter, all the other filters disappears, but they are still there, if you close and re-open the interface they’ll come back, if you change a expression and doesn’t remove the focus from the filed it’ll not commit the changes, if you delete a datastore and put a new one (because some model changed for example) you have a good chance to not be able to save the interface for some bizarre error and you need to do this operation over and over, the variables name must be upper case for some odd motive, and other things. Another big loss was the metadata navigator that was replaced by ODI Console, a worse version with so many bugs that we had to stop using it. Some bugs like lack of security (everybody could see everything), all the execution ran as supervisor, we couldn’t see the load plans (only place where the security works), we couldn’t see the variables and lots of other things.

BUT despite of that, the functionalities for the DEV team were almost the same.

Now we have a new version of ODI. The 12c. Ok, this is only our first impressions and we could have been doing something very wrong (and I pray for this). When a software changes its version and two specialists takes more than 30 minutes trying to figure out why and how or what they need to do to sum a column in an interface or should I say mapping (yes, this is the new name, I liked it and this is one of the few things that made sense to me in this new version), something is very wrong with it.

Ok let’s start from the beginning. When I started to work with datamart, the first tool that I used was OWB, and after some time when I started to use ODI to make some integration, I really missed some stuffs from OWB. It makes sense to get this two tools and merge it together. From OWB we had a cool mapping process that makes easy to understand what that transformation is doing, multiple targets, and a few other things that I missed in ODI, BUT, ODI has the Agent that allow us to connect anywhere without the need to create a heterogeneous service or a dblink or other stuff like that, it has more flexibility (and when I say more you can understand infinite more), we don’t need to deploy the mapping to create a procedure in a oracle database to integrate something, what makes the development test super-fast, we have a lot of components, well, ODI is so much better in this aspect that the few things I missed doesn’t bother me at all.

So in this new version they tried to merge the two tools. What looks good in the paper (I mean blogs and documentations) looks terrible in ODI.

We installed it this weekend to see what happened in this new version and we saw a very different workspace for the interface, I mean for the mappings. This simple ODI UI…

ODI 11g Interface UI

ODI 11g Interface UI

Turned into this:

ODI 12c Interface UI

ODI 12c Interface UI

Humm looks good right? Well, yes and no. I’m working in a 60” full screen TV and I need to drag the screen left and right, up and down to make everything visible, poor devs that has a screen smaller than mine.

Ok but this is only layout, everything else should be better right? Well, unless we were doing something very wrong they put a lot of more complexity to solve some issues that we were able to solve very quickly since version 10.

First of all, in all the other versions if you want to sum something in ODI you just need to get the expression in the target datastore and put a SUM() function on it. ODI would do the group by for you and everything is ok.

ODI 11g Sum

ODI 11g Sum

In the new version you need to drag an object called Aggregate, put all the columns that you want to map trough this (like in OWB), change the options of this object, and in the end, put the same SUM() expression in this object instead of in the target datastore.

ODI 12c Sum Part 1

ODI 12c Sum Part 1

ODI 12c Sum Part 2

ODI 12c Sum Part 2

ODI 12c Sum Part 3

ODI 12c Sum Part 3

If you try to put the expression as before (<=11g) it’ll not create the group by and you’ll not be able to run the interface because it will just simply fail ….

Well, at least in OWB when you use the Aggregate object it’ll aggregate the columns that you define without the need to write the SUM() function. Why they put this new complexity? Ok you can execute this SUM() in another place different from the source or the target but still…

We have some other components that we need to use in the interface right now.

ODI 12c Mapping Components

ODI 12c Mapping Components

The dataset is used when you want more than one dataset in the source (we already have it in the 11g, the difference now is that you need more screen to manage it but the bright side is that you’ll not forget to change anything because you missed the datastore tab like in the old version [yes I did it a lot])

ODI 11g Datastore

ODI 11g Datastore

ODI 12c Datastore

ODI 12c Datastore

The distinct component does not need to be explained, the only thing I had to say is that in the old versions you need only to flag it in a simple check box and now we need to add a distinct component in the flow, drag all columns to it and them drag those columns again to the target. A complete waste of time.

ODI 11g distinct

ODI 11g distinct

ODI 12c Distinct

ODI 12c Distinct

The expression… well, almost the same as Aggregate. Now instead of just write any expression in the target datastore you may add this object in the flow, BUT it will work if you just write the expression on the target. So, why do we need to have this additional object???

ODI 11g Expression

ODI 11g Expression

ODI 12c Expression

ODI 12c Expression

For the filter, join and lookup table nothing changed.

ODI 12c Lockup

ODI 12c Lockup

The set is to define the type of union you can have between the datasets, same as before but now it’s in the mapping too.

ODI 12c Set

ODI 12c Set

We now have a sort component, so now we may stop doing “SQL injection” or “KMs changes” for a simple order by component (of course I liked this one).

ODI 12c Sort

ODI 12c Sort

And the Split component. This one is what I missed the most in OWB. This allow us to say something like: if the DIMENSION is Account, all the data goes to DIM_ACCOUNT, DIMENSION =  ENTITY then DIM_ENTITY, the others goes to DIM_OTHERS for example.

This is a cool thing but easily done using our command on source and target in a procedure (See this post 10 Important Things to Improve ODI Integrations With Hyperion Planning Part 2).

ODI 12c Split

ODI 12c Split

As we can see a lot of things were made for this version, but all this things makes it unusable. Really, in the old versions I already tried to not use interface, only if was absolute necessary, because they are time consuming, inflexible, hard to maintain and there’s nothing you can’t do in a procedure that is a lot better and faster to create then interfaces, in fact I only use interface when I want to use the CKM to use some constraints for data quality, nothing I can’t do in a procedure, but this is for sure something easier to achieve using interfaces. Despite of that, everything else I prefer to use a procedure, mainly because I can get rid of the models, that looks good, but for me they are the true villain of ODI. Models are hard coded information, and I hate hard code.

In resume, in this new version things that were relative simple to use, now are a nightmare to create. Of course that things will get more visual but the developers will pay a very high price for that cool looking. Oracle just added foolish complexity on things that were simple and that worked very well. Do you want a final example? On prior versions of ODI, you would import all KMs that you needed for that specific project and you would pick one of them from the combo box on the flow tab. If you needed to change it later, just pick another one from that same list and that’s it:

KMs 11g

ODI 11g KM Selection

On version 12, first you need to be on the Logical tab of the Mapping object, click on the target table to get its focus, expand “Target” properties on the right panel and select its target “Integration Type”. This type will filter which KMs you will be able to see in the Physical tab:

IntegrationType1

ODI 12c KM Selection 1

In the Physical tab, click again on the target table, expand “Integration Knowledge Module” and select one of the KMs of that type that you filtered in the previous tab:

IntegrationType2

ODI 12c KM Selection 2

And what happens if you want to change the KM? If it is from a different type, first you need to go to the Logical tab, change its type, go to Physical, and select another KM. Ok, they have categorized the KMs and this is a good thing but why they didn’t add the Integration Type in the same tab of the KM selector??? Now we need to go back and forth without any good aparent reason and if you are in doubt on which KM to select and you want to read their descriptions to see which one best fits your needs, then you are totally screwed.

But there are two really cool things about this 12c version. First one debugger! Finally they added a debugger to ODI! This feature was a long waited one because it was simply terrible to debug things in ODI. Now you can go execute the code step by step, take a look in the variables content for that session and you can even query uncommitted data through the transactions:

debug_odi

ODI 12c Debug

Second cool stuff: Roles in Security Module! Again, another long awaited simple feature that did not exist until now. Roles are similar to Groups where the security added to a Role is replicated to all users that belongs to that Role. This is great, because in the old days, Security configuration was madness with a lot of manual configuration. Finally now we will have a better Security framework to work on it.

Roles_ODI

ODI 12c Roles

Well, there’s a lot of thing to see in this new version yet, but the first thing wasn’t pretty. I didn’t uninstall it yet. Let’s see if we can find anything good that justify this living hell that the interfaces (mappings) turned out to be.

If someone of you learn something different or get a different idea for this new version please let us know because I still don’t believe that these changes happened and this is the way Oracle wants us to work from now on. (By the way the UI for procedures are different too and for now I’ll not say if I liked it or not because normally we need some time to get used to it [but I didn’t like it J]).

This weekend we’ll try a migration and let our impressions here.

See you guys!

Advertisements

9 Responses to “ODI 12c First impressions”

  1. Hi Ricardo

    We have strived to improve the discoverability of transformations and make the design more meaningful and subsequent maintenance costs, there are many cases where many people do not understand some of the toggles in 11g, believe me I have been on the phone calls, read the mail threads. Many customers come to ODI 11g and don’t understand many of the gestures since they are a little different from anything they have seen. In the design experience there were also a number of destructive operations related to ordering of transformations (x after y) and topology usage – where does the user perform a sum, before or after a union for example, it isn’t obvious what the meaning is from the design and causes much redesign. The 11g design is fairly physical in many cases when you understand the code generation capabilities (when to use packages with temporary interfaces and when not to).

    The expression component supports composition of expressions for reusability and are not a necessity, they can still be defined on components such as the target datastore itself. There is an illustration of the expression composition below;
    https://blogs.oracle.com/dataintegration/entry/odi_12c_s_mapping_designer

    Anyone, just wanted to let you know I have been reading and observing. For each negative there is always a plus.

    Cheers
    David

    • Hi David how are you?

      We agree with you that there is always a positive and negative side of a big change. We as professionals and enthusiasts of Oracle technologies believe that ODI is the best ETL tool in the market and it is the key to enhance the EPM environment and therefore we created this blog, to show what can be done to increase the capabilities of those tools.

      Do not get us wrong, version 12 has several interesting features that justifies migrating to this new version and in our opinion they would be in this order:

      1-Debbuger;
      2-Roles in security module;
      3-Data store modification control;
      4-Parallel loads;
      5-Multiple targets;
      6-Golden Gate enhanced integration;
      7-Enhanced security settings with Wallet;
      8-Components like Order by and Split;

      All these features are very useful and show that Oracle is aware of ODI community because since version 11 all these were done, but only by advanced users that created workarounds like changing KM, Jython coding, SQL injection techniques and even repository manipulation. Also the GUI seems more reliable, for example, when we move the focus between objects, the changes are no longer lost, objects do not disappear when deleting other objects of the same type, etc.

      Our frustration was with the design of the development GUI and the attempt to unify two tools in one. Do not misunderstand us, we think that OWB must be integrated into the ODI, however ODI cannot lose its essence. At present, the tool does seem neither ODI nor OWB, because we do not have all the objects that were powerful in OWB as the pivot and unpivot, and we no longer have the simplicity of ODI, which was consecrated as a simple but powerful tool.

      I understand your comment that new users felt lost when using ODI for the first time, but certainly the old ODI users will feel lost with these new changes, and this could be minimized if we had at least an option to choose on continue using a “classic ODI” development mode (without dragging a lot of components to the diagram) or use the new “ODI/OWB” hybrid mode (less simple but more visual). Remove the simplicity of ODI means removing one of its best qualities that helped it to become the ETL market leader tool. The number of clicks, “back and forth” between tabs, necessary visual objects and even how to develop procedures (the procedure box is so small that now you are “forced” to use the “advanced code editor”) makes the development process too bureaucratic and time consuming. The tool should be simple, robust, efficient, and sometimes trying to make it more “new user friendly” can reduce the learning curve for them, but increase the overall development time.

      We are the most interested in Oracle improving their tools as we work daily and massively over them, including creating products to facilitate the development, implementation and administration of the same, so if you want to talk more about this topic, it will be an honor and a pleasure for us.

  2. Hi ! Nice blog!
    I don´t know if this is the best place to ask, But anyway! We´ve tried to reverse an XSD file in ODI, but it reverses with missing tags! Do you have any idea what may be happening?
    Thanks!
    Karla

  3. Oh God! This is exactly how I felt the moment I tried creating a mapping. I can’t understand a thing!

    Completely agree on the Procedure thing. The best feature in ODI 10/11g. I am yet to do some tinkering around with 12c.

    I hope to get an easy to understand mapping tutorial on Internet.

    Cheers,

  4. The only thing which stand right in this blog is, odi 11g and 12c has a lot of bugs. Even the central repository gets corrupted. However I am expecting this to get mature in near future.

    The second is, gui. Only the security section is cramped, I thing oracle can separated designer, monitoring and migration and topology to 4 separate tools which can be invoked fron designer. Just like informatica.

    The concept of mapping are great, most good tools in market have this capability. Hidden tricks that exists in odi 11g create a mess in big projects.

    Scenero migration should be in form of deployment group where you select scenero based on some date or tag and just drag that deployment group to product odi and its deployed with all its dependencies.

    Odi has been held back and it’s time to free this tool

    • Hi Amir how are you? I agree with you about the Hidden triks and it should be avaliable to everyone not only to a few (in fact this is why we write this blog). My point about the ODI 12 is only regarding the GUI that instead to be easer to use is a lot more time consuming than before. This is what we don’t like. Everything else is ok. I did not like the idea of have to drag and drop a object to the canvas to aggregate the data and have the need to write the SUM statment on it. Why no maintain simple as it was before if you still need to write it? Now I have to do one more operation that I did not need before.

      And in our case that we talk about ODI with EPM is a little worst because Oracle don’t want to maintain the Hyperion Planning and HFM KMs.

      Don’t get us wrong, we still think that ODI is a great tool, and when we said that about the GUI is because we want ODI to be the best tool ever. Also we are working with everybody we know to make Oracle support the KMs for hyperion in ODI 12 as well.

      Thanks.

  5. hi,
    how 2 create a mapping in odi 12c using odi sdk code.

    thanks.

  6. amir riaz Says:

    yup agreed, we used to have a lot of ODI 10g clients. they started to leave ODI with 11g and with 12c we have not got a new clients. All our clients are moving to informatica. despite low cost, the enterprises are not ready to risk the investment.

  7. Wholeheartedly agree – this product is now way more complex than necessary and the obsession with EM/GRID/SOA etc. integration is just plain complex and unnecessary. I used it from 10 onwards and have just given up with 12c after 1-2 weeks of trying to debug missing steps in ‘getting started’ guides and obscure java error messages and ODI message numbers which don’t resolve/exist in error manuals etc. Just pathetic. I cant recommend this product to any of my customers as a consultant on any level. Oracle have lost the plot. Many Open Source tools are far better.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: